Dignity
Dignity comes from the Latin word ‘dignus’ (which means worthy/ deserving). Most
of us understand dignity in a very simple way, such as the helping patients to
retain their dignity during medical treatment. We also, understand the dignity
of women, whereby we believe that a lady has a right to be free from harassment
in the workplace, for instance. Probably, the easiest form of dignity, which we
recognise, is the dignity of a new born child. The new born child doesn’t
really express many attributes, their personality is not yet developed, and
they spend most of their time sleeping, eating, going to the toilet, laughing,
crying or simply observing what’s going on, yet we love new born children!
There is something about them which is beautiful and alluring even though we
don’t know what it is. I believe that this is the dignity of the new born child;
we instinctively appreciate this little person, just as they are without any
focus on their external attributes other than their being cute to look at!
This is what we can call the innate dignity of the
child, but if we think about it more deeply, if we compare say a new born child
with a very aged individual do we feel the same feelings of love towards the
elderly person which we feel towards the infant?
I think not!
In fact I know not!
Elderly people are not seen in the same light at
all. We cope with old people, we tolerate old people, after all we philosophise
to ourselves that these elderly persons have served society well or they are
loved members of our own family. Perhaps they have raised us and we feel
gratitude towards them. This is all good, but isn’t it interesting that we
force ourselves to tolerate them? Why are we not delighted the way we are when
it comes to infants?
An infant who is a few weeks old is roughly on par
with an elderly geriatric patient, who is at the end stages of their life. Neither
the infant nor the old person can control their bladder and bowel functions;
neither is capable of walking and neither is really present in that they are
here but really they are somewhere else. Brad Pitt, in the movie “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button” presented
this amazing comparison in this story of a man who was living his life
backwards, starting with old age and ending with birth. This delightful movie
demonstrated aptly the similarities between the beginning and end sages of
life.
The picture of life and death and reincarnation as presented by the Krishna Consciousness movement
(ISKCON) in their life cycle paintings, comes to mind when
we think about this comparison.
It is not my intention here to suggest that
reincarnation is a reality, some people believe in it and others do not, but
what I am suggesting is that the beginning and end stages in life do appear to
be cyclical in nature.
The thing which really peaks my interest is the way
that these two similar stages in life promote completely different feelings. Anyone
who has taken care of elderly parents can vouch for the difficulty involved and
how it becomes a burden, one which is only removed with the passing of the
elderly parent. Of course, the difficulty found when facing death and the
realisation that things are only going to get worse rather than better inclines
the relatives towards a wanting for the release and that this release is a
blessing rather than a curse. This is all fine and understandable but, putting
the subject of dealing with death to one side, why the feeling of a burden when
an old person behaves likes a young child?
I feel that the answer to this lies in the subject of
dignity. Our society, in general, is
focused on external attributes, what are external attributes? They are
things about us which reflect how we interact with the world. So we look at a
whole list of things such as physical appearance. It has been proven by
scientific experiments that beautiful people tend to be more successful than
not so beautiful people1.
Our present day society is very ageist in that the younger the better, this is
an example of an external attribute. But what other attributes do we look for?
Well things like wealth, success, and even simple things like status. How often
do we meet new people and either they ask us or we ask them “what do you do for
a living?” or “what do you work at?” This is a feeler question whereby we are
checking out their status and seeing if they match our background. This is an unconscious
decision but it is there all the same.
Unemployment is another good example. How many
people feel bad when they lose their job? How many people lose a sense of their
self when either they lose their job or they face retirement? Why is it that many
men die several years after retiring? Why do some millionaires kill themselves when
they become bankrupt, as is often evidenced during major economic crashes?
The answer to this is external attributes. In our society
we are thought to look for and appreciate these external attributes. Another
example of this focus on external attributes is our love of fame and famous
people. Again in today’s society we have become fascinated by fame and famous
people. We seem to be more interested in the lives of famous people than in the
lives of our family members and friends who are actually in relationship with
us! Now how crazy is that!
Returning to our comparison of our perceptions
regarding aged persons versus young infants, it is an interesting thing to note
that in society in general we do not appreciate the aged. Feelings of burden
are to be expected in close family relations, whenever there is serious illness
present, so we should not think too much about this. However, even if we put
our own family relations to one side it is easy to see that the elderly are
generally ignored or stereotyped in our society. At least in decades past the
old person was seen as an elderly adviser who could point the way, whereas
these days they are seen in the same light as old cars that have had their day!
Why is it?...Why is it that even though we respect
the elderly we just do not delight in them to the same degree as we do with
young children?... Why is society so prejudiced against the elderly? Just look
at the ads on the TV, how many of them feature old people? Not many and those
which do feature stereotypical figures of grandma and grandpa, but that’s about
it.
Society is fixated on producers!
The reason for this lack of interest in the elderly,
I feel, relates back to our focus on external attributes. Our society is so
geared to picking up on success signals that once a person becomes elderly they
are pretty much relegated and ignored. Unconsciously, possibly even pre-consciously
we recognise a certain obsolescence in the elderly. Their family members might
still love them because of old familial ties, but society in general sees the
elderly as out-dated. Society is continually fixated on producers, on who can
produce the top result in society. The rich, the famous and the powerful are on
the top end of the ladder of society, with pretty much every other person
trying their best to pry their way up the ladder towards success.
The reason then why we tolerate the elderly, rather
than love them, is because unconsciously
encoded in our minds is an evaluation of a person’s worth based upon external
attributes. The elderly, the poor, the weak and disabled, the people who
don’t fit in, hell even the not so good looking, get relegated because on some
level we evaluate them and put them into the category of “not so successful”. It’s not that we dislike them it’s just that
we judge them as being a waste of time or certainly as not been worth our
extended efforts.
In case you think me too unkind just take a look at
the example of two men, one very good looking and the other not so good
looking. Even though the not so good looking man may possess the same traits,
the same level of intelligence, personality, the same value system, even if he
is exactly the same yet he looks less attractive it will definitely have an
effect, won’t it? Let’s take an even more interesting example of a man who at
25 is the talk of the town and yet at aged 50 he is seen as middle aged. The
same individual, yet his attractiveness to members of the opposite sex and his
appeal in general will be reduced, not by any change within him but merely as a
consequence of the ageing process and how it affects his outward appearance. Of
course he could exercise and dye his hair and so on and more than likely fare
better than before, but all these measures are merely projecting a youthful
image aren’t they?
Of course it’s not quite so simple. A middle aged
man will often possess more confidence and may well do better at presenting
himself in an authoritative way simply by his (now mature) physical appearance.
But isn’t this once again a case of external attributes?
Finally let’s take an example of ageism in the
opposite direction. A policeman sees a man breaking a red light and pulls him
to one side. The man in question is very young, possibly a teenager and his
lack of maturity results in a shyness which prevents him from communicating effectively.
There is a good chance that he will receive a fine. On the other hand, a man on
the same type of bike doing the same activity, when stopped takes off his
helmet and we see that he is a middle aged man. Because he is older he can
communicate in a better way and also due to maturity he knows how to be
respectful and apologetic towards the policeman. In this case there is a good
chance that he will get off without a fine. This is all obvious I think you
will agree. Young men do more stupid things and policemen will immediately
think badly of them, unless they demonstrate a good degree of communication and
deliver the appropriate level of respect, whereas middle aged men rarely do
stupid things and are better communicators. But still the point remains that
external attributes are the determining factor in how the policeman will judge
these two people.
So what are we to do about attributes?
It would be an impossible job to stop judging
according to external appearance and certainly there are times when it makes
sense. For example, if you are looking for someone to rent out your apartment,
it just makes sense to go for the well turned out respectable persons. They may
turn out to be otherwise, but as a rule of thumb they will usually be more
regular and well behaved than say someone who is dishevelled and jobless.
So what are
we to do?
Well we cannot change society (at least not overnight),
but we can make a shift in our consciousness by becoming more aware of this
subtle judgemental process. Basically this inner judgemental thinking mode is neither
good nor bad, rather it is a survival tool which somehow ended up taking centre
stage in our decision making process! It is necessary, for each individual to be
able to assess their reality on a regular basis. People, who do not check their
reality, end up losing touch with it and our mental homes are occupied by many of
these individuals. So it is really important to be able to assess a situation
and judge it from the perspective of deciding what to do next. “Should I
overtake this car now, how is the other driver behaving?” “Should I marry this
person, are they like my family members?”, “Should I open up and talk with this
person, is it safe to do so?”, “should I give time to this person, or are they
going to waste my time?”, “Should I lend this person money. Will I ever get it
back?” These are some of the judgemental questions which we make unconsciously
or pre-consciously on a daily basis. In this sense this inner judgemental
mechanism is a good thing.
However,
when this survival mechanism takes over and we start allocating people
according to a hidden hierarchy, which lies just below the level of our
everyday consciousness, well this is not a good thing at all!
Somewhere along the way the master became the
servant and today the number one defect present in the world is judgementalism.
Everybody is judging everybody and the net result is distrust, anxiety, tension,
worry, fear and reactive thinking and acting which added all together provides
for a nasty mix which does not help anyone or society in general!
But we can take hope from the example of the love,
which most people feel towards an infant. Surely there is some consistency
here. Why is it that certain things make us happy, or that people in general
seek out love and try to establish a family for themselves. It may not be a
traditional family, but most people do feel happiest when they are involved in
a loving romantic relationship and when they have some sort of family life, as
in surrounding themselves with people whom they love?
Personally, I feel that these repetitive patterns in
human behaviour points the way towards which we can live a successful and happy
life. If we can feel love towards a young infant and yet not feel love towards
a regular person than what is the difference?
The difference lies in the judgemental process at
work. We judge the young child as been perfect and as having all the best
external attributes in waiting. While young infants do not demonstrate
many external attributes, which society valorises, they do possess the potential for these attributes.
Whereas say an old person, for instance, demonstrates practically zero
potential for these external attributes, hence we judge them as been outmoded!
If we take out the judgement process then hey presto we love old people, is that right?
Well it’s a little more difficult than this, because
so much of our thinking occurs in the unconscious or pre-concious mind, so a
complete reversal of this judgemental process is probably next to impossible.
But we can try the following:
A). Focus on the inherent dignity of human life.
Think about it, read about it and expand your perceptions regarding human
beings in general.
B). Become more aware of your judgemental process at
work
C). Practice becoming more philosophical. Whenever
you become aware of a dichotomy between your judgement and the inherent demands
of dignity, think about how you may respond better to the demands of the
situation.
D). Endeavour to treat others according to the
demands of inherent dignity whenever possible.
Inherent Dignity????
Inherent dignity what is that?
Inherent dignity means the respect which you are due
for no other reason than you are a human being.It is both a simple concept and
a difficult one at the same time. It is a simple concept because we all know
that we should respect everyone, as Jesus says “treat others as you would like
to be treated”, we all know this. However, it is also difficult because it is
so hard to apply this to EVERYONE. It’s the EVERYONE bit which is so
difficult, because we all want to judge and classify others.
The
difficulty which we face, as human beings, is that our personalities are far
from mature and yet we need to feel a strong sense of self in order to function
in this world.
Since we are essentially immature, this
strong sense of self is lacking and is replaced instead by a false self or
false ego, whereby we are in denial of aspects of our personalities which are not
integrated. What we mean by a lack of integration means that certain aspects of
our personalities are at odd’s with our self concept. For example, a person may
be confident in many spheres yet they lack confidence when it comes to their
physical appearance. This represents a lack of integration. In an attempt at
bypassing these strong feelings of
inadequacy this person instead of feeling inadequate, their unconcous
mind projects a critical side whereby they criticise the appearance of other
people. They are in fact projecting their own dislike of their self onto other
people. However, they are not concoius of this and this causes problems. For a
start they are still unhappy with their own physical appearance and secondly
they have a bad habit of critising everybody else’s appearance. They feel
somewhat unhappy but cannot explain how and also they irritate their freinds
and relatives with their harsh criticisms.
This is the sort of thing which we are all doing on
an unconcious level. It is because of this self-defensive judgementalism that we
feel at odds with others. If you ever find yourself disliking someone or
some thing it is a gurantee that something about them reflects some aspect of
your own self which you do not like very much!
Getting back to inherent dignity, the first step in
this process is to accept that we are all essentially immature and that our
unconcious minds compensate in a rather inappropriate way by developing
prejudices which we project onto others. Also, society itself projects
prejudices onto its members on a continual basis. Returning back to external attributes, society projects prejudices all the time about what is ideal. For example, if you
look at paintings from the 18th and 19th centuries you
will note the number of famous female nude paintings whereby the female model
is chubby. Back in those days the prejudice “chubby is good” was projected onto
society whereas today the prejudice “skinny is good” is being projected
instead!
Dignity – Society – People
We all know that society isn't what it should be.
Everyone appears to be too critical of just about everyone and everything else.
Nothing seems right with the world. Society appears to be worsening, or so
everyone says!
This world has never changed so much, in all of its
history, as it has in the last one hundred years. In many ways we are truly
making progress as a civilisation. It may not appear so because of all the
confusion, prejudice, misunderstandings and hatred. But these have always been
present throughout every age of man. However, today a new quality is present and
it is transparency. Thanks both to technology and a greater level of open
mindedness we are reaching a level of communication and transparency in human
activities which has never before been envisaged.
Behind all of the confusion lies the hope, the hope
for a greater and wiser humanity. We have to believe that man is not simply the
result of a blind watchmaker hitting a home run! I believe that there is some purpose in mankind and
that we, as a race, have a destiny to fulfil and that one of the key
cornerstones is dignity, not only for the potential evolution of mankind but
also it represents the way to wholeness and happiness on an individual level as
well!
Try out the four suggestions above. It will not be
easy, both because of our own inner prejudices as well as societies prejudices which
are projected onto us in the form of external attributes, but it is worth a
try.
The good thing with dignity and our work towards
recogising it in everyone is that regardless of our success rate the effort is
worthwhile. Even if we only make a little progress it will yield an increase in
personal happiness, alleviation in discrimination towards others and an
evolution of mankind towards some better future!
It’s worth the effort, give it try I think you will
like the result!
1. Landy, David; Sigall,
Harold
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol 29(3), Mar 1974,
299-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0036018
Comments
Post a Comment